It seems the original guy may have pronounced the 'T' because he was Dutch and didn't know any different. Or everything on Wikipedia is a little bit wrong...No, that would never happen!!

Pedants' Paradise
#3346
Posted 26 June 2019 - 12:16
#3347
Posted 03 July 2019 - 14:52
I'm not fully sure of Wiki's remit. I know there are people there who believe that a tertiary source is not permitted to refer to any primary sources, only secondary ones. That seems insane to me, but I suppose it's possible it's the official line. Even if it is legitimate, their secondary source evaluation needs a lot of improvement.
#3348
Posted 03 July 2019 - 15:54
I have a friend who works for an accounting firm called Swindells. She says they pronounce it "Swin-delles" with the emphasis on the second syllable. I'm not convinced the pronunciation helps .
#3349
Posted 03 July 2019 - 17:23
I have a friend who works for an accounting firm called Swindells. She says they pronounce it "Swin-delles" with the emphasis on the second syllable. I'm not convinced the pronunciation helps
.
Sounds to me like a contrived name, like the Estate Agents 'Doolitle and Dalley' in Kidderminster. and an Accountants 'Drinkwater and Passmore'. A genuine one is the Solicitors 'Wright, Hassall and Co' (Wolverhampton I think)
#3350
Posted 03 July 2019 - 17:38
#3351
Posted 09 July 2019 - 18:55
#3352
Posted 09 July 2019 - 20:48
Definitely 'is' . It would be 'There are Baptist Chapels, British Schools and Charities' (i.e. plural)
#3353
Posted 09 July 2019 - 20:51
#3354
Posted 26 November 2019 - 09:57
Email from ebay:
Get a 50' Samsung 4K TV for only £349I'm not quite sure a 50 foot TV would fit in my house, but it really would be a bargain!
#3355
Posted 26 November 2019 - 10:02
"Find out whose changing role this quarter"
Top headline on the home page of company intranet. I checked it several times yesterday but it remained. It had been corrected to 'who is' by the time I logged in this morning.
#3356
Posted 01 December 2019 - 23:52
I recently came across a (non-cryptic) crossword clue: Programs (4), for which the solution appeared to be APPS. Surely apps are software and programs are instructions to a computer. An app is no more a program than a cake is a recipe!
#3357
Posted 04 December 2019 - 12:16
I recently came across a (non-cryptic) crossword clue: Programs (4), for which the solution appeared to be APPS. Surely apps are software and programs are instructions to a computer. An app is no more a program than a cake is a recipe!
So how do you think an "App" does anything - an "App" will usually comprise of multiple "programs" which contain the instructions to the operating system.
Instructions to a computer are "code" and "programs" comprises lines of code arranged as programs which can be invoked (behind the scenes usually).
or put it another way - "Apps" is shorthand for "Application Program"
#3358
Posted 05 December 2019 - 15:54
I recently came across a (non-cryptic) crossword clue: Programs (4), for which the solution appeared to be APPS. Surely apps are software and programs are instructions to a computer. An app is no more a program than a cake is a recipe!
Apps and programs are effectively synonymous. In modern parlance an app is generally associated with a hand-held device (phone, tablet etc.) whereas programs tend to run on laptops, desktops etc.
FWIW I've been a software engineer/developer for nearly 25 years.
#3359
Posted 06 December 2019 - 09:40
I found the above posts enlightening - except that being a real cyber idiot I don't think my brain has taken much in and I am not all that enlightened! To me it's all a bit like driving the car and not knowing anything about what goes on under the bonnet. I just click or press and sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. I am full of admiration for those who understand the ins and outs !
#3360
Posted 06 December 2019 - 14:02
Maybe we have to accept that in fast-moving areas, such as IT, the meanings of words change more rapidly than normal. And the words used for a particular meaning also change more rapidly. For example, when I were a lad (well, a bit after that; computers didn't really exit when I really were a lad) a programmer called him- or herself a programmer, not a "coder". I personally loathe the term "coder" because (a) "code" is associated in my mind with the hiding of meaning, while a good programming language is about revealing, in human-friendly terms, the meaning behind a string of numbers that would otherwise make sense only to the hardware; and because (b) the process of translating a method into code is actually rather dull and unimaginative - the interesting end of programming, the rewarding bit, is deciding what approach to adopt in the first place.