QUOTE(IrisH - LoonY @ Nov 21 2006, 11:00 PM)

Well, I've been playing piano for 5 years, and it's recently been dawning on me that I can't play the piano to save my life. I've not got a single piece I can call "complete" or whatever. It's like an uphill struggle to do ANYTHING. Even when it's getting to final stages of being "complete", it seems to fall apart again and takes ages to rebuild. e.g Debussy's Sarabande, played it for over a year and STILL can't play it properly because something ALWAYS goes wrong!!! And really this isn't exactly encouraging.
Think I'll just quit piano...
What you are experiencing now is the
phenomenon that we warned you about some time last year. Your brain will learn to do exactly what you try to learn to do, i.e. what you practise doing. If you practise learning pieces accurately and well then that is what you will learn to do; if you practise learning them quickly and inaccurately then that's what you will learn to do. Of course the only practical way to practise learning pieces musically and accurately is to learn pieces that are within one's grasp that one can do this on. Yes there's a shortcut 'to the top' learning hard pieces as soon as one wants, but this comes as a cost. I recally you agreeing not to go straight on to grade 8; but you have instead just not done the exam and gone on to grade 8 repertoire, which is effectively the same thing.
Let's assume you are a pianist of 'average' natural ability (you can skew the figures whichever way you like if you believe the statement to be false). Then in this case, given that you have kept up playing for 5 years, you'd currently be between grade 4 and grade 5 and set to score about 114 on grade 5 (without having to put in more than normal preparation, whatever that might be). It's true that your other musical knowledge may be something that would put you above average; likewise it's true that your chosen learning path may disadvantage you: those that have been learning to play pieces musically and accurately will have practised that skill, hence learnt it.
If your pieces are all such an uphill struggle it probably means they are too difficult for you; there's nothing wrong with a challenge sometimes but everything being so hard is just disheartening and doesn't actually help you to learn anything from the piece. I've been at the point where I could play some difficult pieces, not brilliantly and certainly it took a long time, my solution to that was to start back at the beginning adress the problems that I had and learn the way that would allow me to achieve what I want on the piano. You have to make this choice too: if you want to learn to play musically and accurately then you have to practise playing musically and accurately. You can achieve this by going back to easier pieces, and there's plenty of 'nice' easier repertoire and working on them in a disciplined manner, not necessarily right back to grade 1 in your case, maybe to grade 4 standard pieces or so. This is, of course, If the musicality and accuracy is, as you suggest, what you want to achieve from your playing. Of course how much you want it will determine whether it's worth it to you to go back. If you're happy doing what you're doing then that's fine, but bear in mind that you'll always play as you learn to play and going back will be more frustrating the later you leave it.
Some final remarks, the first is that the metronome is your friend, it is a useful tool in ensuring accuracy (even though you don't like it). I don't think you're underachieving compared to where you should be, but if those are your goals you're simply applying your effort in the wrong direction. You need to decide what you want to get out of playing the piano and then go ahead and do the work if necessary. Good luck

.